Time for you to make your move. I’ve been waiting for ages already. Oh, and my pieces are black. So take your hands offa my queen, dipshit.
Monthly Archive for July, 2008
Woot! Back on track for Princess no Rondo! At least this is my most anticipated anime so far, so I think I should focus more on this one. But yeah, it’s still the same stuff: Crappy OP-ED, boobs, implied sex, cuteness and moe, AND HOORAY FUCKING CENSORSHIP!
HOLYCRAP! V-F MISSILES AT 12 O’CLOCK! EVASIVE MANEUVERS!
The training for the Knights of Undine commences, but is halted by the sudden appearance of Tifa, who comes in wearing Tristein Magic Academy uniform. Seems that Henrietta gave permission that she be able to stay at the academy for a number of reasons: First, since she’s of noble status due to her relations to Henrietta. Second, she’s got magic of the ancient arts that may prove useful in the war. Third, Saito’s there.
Third option seemed fucked up… Way too fucked up… But yeah…
“Hey, Saito. I’m naked now. Should I ‘clean’ your Derflinger, or should I get ready to be pierced by it?”
Continue reading ‘Zero no Tsukaima – Princess no Rondo 4: The Rumored New Student’
So we get a change of pace for Strike Witches. This time around, Yoshika may not get the spotlight, but she’s going to be deeply involved with the star of the episode: Lynette Bishop.
Bedlolis: They never cease to amuse me on the way they’re almost EVERYWHERE.
Yoshika gets her formal enlistment to the Strike Witches team, and is designated to the rank of Sergeant. Of course, there were greetings and introductions, with the very typical tsundere moment coming from Yuri-Yuri Perinne (who’s beginning to get to my nerves, which typically means I’ll one day find the time to draw her being ruthlessly raped by ensigns). With Yoshika still being unfamiliar on most things, Sakamoto orders Lynne to tour Yoshika around the base.
Of course, boobgroping is also around.
… for the better…?
Now a lot of people have been telling me to change my style of writing? Why? I don’t even understand why I have to, so what’s with the persuasion? Is it really that “aggressive”? Is it really that “offensive”? What will people think if I change my way of writing? Or to generalize: Will this change be for the better?
Actually, I’m clueless to what the answer is. I don’t even know if I’m doing anything wrong with the way I write. More like the question is if I care if I’m doing it wrong, but that’s an understatement anyway, not a question. When the idea came into me, I asked myself: Change? For what? Why? Whom? When? Where? And when I tried to enumerate the answers on those, none came out useful or convincing enough. So if I were to change, will everything go according to that change?
That’s one indefinite question there. A single change does bring out other changes, if instances are applied. But one thing’s for sure: If I change, something will be gained, something will be lost. If I change the way I write into something more “amiable” and “mild” for the audience, it’s like shunning my true self out of the spotlight I myself have made. I don’t want that. It’s useless for that, and with that stated out, I decided to rule out the change.
We should remember that there may be changes, but change alone is not tied to only one thing. There may be good changes, there may be bad changes. There are lots of changes, and I know I’m not only tied to the change of my writing style. I can change something else, like elaboration, or emphasis, etc. It may change some of the semantics, but it’s still retains a style. That’s what my type of change should be.
Right now, I’m not changing anything, and that’s final. But I’m also glad that this was brought up, especially by Mike. It’s strange that you who differs way too much in my way of writing would boldly state how you feel on the style. An amount of self-reflection was done, and something meaningful was achieved, so this post ain’t half-bad after all.
Then again, it’s still the usual thingamajig, so what gives…
I don’t even know why I’m writing this! Or am I even writing this?!
I’ve been told by many people on how I write. I write differently when it comes to my novels and short stories if they compare it to my blog entries. My way of talking to most people are, so they say, “spiked”, “spunky” or “aggressive”, but that doesn’t surface much when I write or talk seriously. And most people tend to confuse the two into my active and passive behaviors, mainly because I’m unstable and confusing myself. Confusing, no?
And that brings the question: How does one write? How does one “write”? What’s the difference between the two? What’s with the stupid quotation marks? Or more importantly, why do they even exist as diversified extensions of the word?
Look, I’m not trying to get smart here, nor am I one-upping you, or bitching at you, or something. I just want to state out and answer the questions, or the so-called “assumptions” by some people who comment on how I write, as well as the entirety of the ideas behind my way of writing. I hope I made that clear before I continue. No Grammar Nazis, no proofreading shit. We’re talking about my “way” of writing, and nothing else.
Now, welcome to my world, bitches… Wait, wrong iconic psychopath…
Just what is writing and “writing”? If you have such a clever wit on the play of words, you’d get my point: One is real, uniform and formal, one is not. If you look at it like you’re skimming a book, you can’t tell the difference. After all, what you write can be read, or spoken regardless of the two mentioned above. These are all pretty much similar in a way that you express yourself through words and such. But think: How does “writing” become uniform and formal? How does writing negate that by being the opposite of the definition?
Discussion